1. What is the problem
of personal identity?
How
can we say that I am the same person now as I was when I was younger?
What does it mean to be a person?
2. What is Locke's solution
to the problem of personal identity?
Locke says that the
identity of a person is constituted by conscious awareness of
autobiographical memories. You are whoever you remember being and
whatever you remember doing.
3. Explain the brave officer
example and how it proves Locke wrong.
A person, P, may remember
an event, A, during the time of another event, B. During event C, he
remembers event B but not event A. If memory constitutes personal
identity, then A = B and B = C (since at B he remembers A and at C he remembers B). By the law of transitivity of
identity, C should be identical to A. Yet this would violate Locke's
criterion for personal identity, because at C, he does not remember A.
4. How did Parfit clarify
the problem of personal identity?
Parfit clarifies that
theories about what a person is that lead to a violation of the
transitivity of identity are not bad simply because they violate the
transitivity of identity. Parfit says that when we talk about a
person being the same as me, we're not talking about strict numerical
identity. Rather, we're talking about something else: survival.
Survival requires neither a 1:1 ratio nor an all-or-nothing
categorization.
No comments:
Post a Comment